In this module you heard about careers in two somewhat similar but very different career fields. Please think about these fields and then compare and contrast careers in recreational therapy and athletic training, address how these careers are the same and how they are different.

In this module you heard about careers in two somewhat similar but very different career fields. Please think about these fields and then compare and contrast careers in recreational therapy and athletic training, address how these careers are the same and how they are different. Specifically, you should describe how you think they are most different and most similar, in terms of their scope and practice. Scope and practice refers to the specific work the professionals engage in. While you may mention educational or other lifestyle differences, you must address aspects of scope and practice to earn full credit for your response. Your answer should consist of two paragraphs. Be sure to use specific details or examples in your response! Be sure to refer to the syllabus for writing expectations as well as the rubric, below, for overall grading expectations.

Find two articles that you might possibly use in your Capstone project – and then post them in APA format for your classmates to see. Your articles should be scholarly, professional, governmental and/or academic in content. Click here to understand what those differences are. You are not obligated to use the 2 references in your final Capstone project because this is just your exploration of your topic. You are still evaluating things. Part 2 Explain what makes your 2 articles scholarly, professional, governmental or otherwise reliable.

 
Part 1
Find two articles that you might possibly use in your Capstone project – and then post them in APA format for your classmates to see. Your articles should be scholarly, professional, governmental and/or academic in content. Click here to understand what those differences are. You are not obligated to use the 2 references in your final Capstone project because this is just your exploration of your topic. You are still evaluating things.
Part 2
Explain what makes your 2 articles scholarly, professional, governmental or otherwise reliable. Click here to see sample distinctions.
Part 3
In one or two sentences, tell your classmates what your Capstone topic or problem is. After that, explain exactly how your 2 articles might help you to write your final Capstone project. Again, you do not have to use these references in your final Capstone project because you might change your mind during your exploratory research.

What one piece of legal advice did you find that would be most helpful in starting a new business?  Why?

 
Aligns to SLO 1
IMPORTANT: You must FIRST create a post to reply to question 1 and 2.  After you have replied to question 1 and 2, you will then be able to see your classmates’ responses.  You will then create a SECOND post to address question 3, where you respond to two of your classmates.
A. PART A – create a post to reply to question 1 and 2:
Do an internet search for “starting your own business legal requirements.”  Spend some time exploring and reading the information on the websites that you find.  Then, create a post with the following:
1. What one piece of legal advice did you find that would be most helpful in starting a new business?  Why?
2. What else did you learn about staring a new business that would help make the business successful?  How can this be used to get your business off to a good start?

How did Kezia begin to see her father as a human being who needed her sympathy more than the love of a child to a parent? (b) The ‘wonder tree’, Neem has agro-friendly and eco-friendly properties. Mention some ways by which these qualities of the Neem tree are reflected in the chapter, The Village Pharmacy.

3. Answer any one of the following questions:(a) How did Kezia begin to see her father as a human being who needed her sympathy more   than the love of a child to a parent?  (b) The ‘wonder tree’, Neem has agro-friendly and eco-friendly properties. Mention some ways by which these qualities of the Neem tree are reflected in the chapter, The Village Pharmacy.  

In this assignment you will be writing a Learning Story about yourself! What is a Learning Story?

CD 139: Self Learning Story Assignment

In this assignment you will be writing a Learning Story about yourself! What is a Learning Story?
A ‘Learning Story’ is a record of what a teacher (or parent) has seen a child (or group of children) doing .It is usually focused on a specific incident or episode. It may focus on a group activity, and be a learning story about an activity that the children did together such as visiting a fire station or going on a walk.

Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan. Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.

Assessment 3 Instructions: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
· PRINT
· For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.
The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.
You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
· Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health. 
1. Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
· Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes. 
2. Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
2. Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
· Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals. 
3. Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes. 
4. Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
4. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Reference
Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework. 
BMC Family Practice, 
17.

Professional Context
This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.
Scenario
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.

Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.

Instructions
For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.
The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.
Using the 

Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]
 will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
· Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
· Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
· Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
· Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
· Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
· Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. 
· APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The 

Writing Feedback Tool
is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
· SCORING GUIDE
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE

CRITERIA 

NON-PERFORMANCE 

BASIC 

PROFICIENT 

DISTINGUISHED 

Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.

Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Identify specific traits that made the leader unadmirable or difficult to follow. Identify the effects of this individual’s leadership

 In the workplace, we often are confronted with the reality that our leader possesses qualities or traits that we don’t admire. These can be simply annoying habits or quirks, or they may be styles, traits, or approaches that fundamentally deviate from our own. Although others may tell you that you could always quit or work for someone else, doing so is not always an easy or wise choice. The question then becomes: How can you follow someone you do not admire?
In last week’s Assignment, you incorporated ideas into your presentation for following unadmirable leaders, or leaders with different styles from those of their followers. For this Discussion, consider an actual situation from your own professional career in which you worked for a leader whose leadership style was inconsistent with what you desired, or for a leader whom you did not admire.
 
Post your analysis of the influence of personal traits on leadership and followership by including the following:

Describe the leader in question and the situation in which you worked with them.

Note: Do not identify the individual or the organization where they worked. If necessary, use fictitious names in your description.

Identify specific traits that made the leader unadmirable or difficult to follow. 
Identify the effects of this individual’s leadership.

Did the aspects that made them an unadmirable leader produce any negative consequences, whether for yourself, for another individual, or for the organization? 
If you were able to follow this individual, explain how you were able to do so.

Refer to the Week 6 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work. 
Read some of your colleagues’ postings.

Given future challenges described in the current higher education literature, what conflicts among administrators, faculty, and other stakeholders do you predict will continue?

ED5570_Week5Discussion2_EnvisioningFutureRoleConflicts-GoogleDocs.pdf

ED5570: Week 5 Discussion 2: Envisioning Future Role Conflicts

Given future challenges described in the current higher education literature, what

conflicts among administrators, faculty, and other stakeholders do you predict will

continue? What new conflicts can you envision arising, and why? Support your

response with the literature on current issues and future trends in higher education.

Note: Please see attached
Note: 1 reference required
Note: Minimum of 300 words

What is the purpose of hypotheses and research questions?Why is it important to develop workable hypotheses and research questions in conducting research?

consideringhypothesesandresearchquestions.docx

In this assignment, you will write a paper that analyzes a scenario and explains the purpose of hypotheses and research questions.

Step 1: Read the following scenario.

You are a nurse on 5 West who has concerns about visiting hours in the Critical Care Unit. The unit currently has a visiting-hours policy that allows patients to rest and the staff to provide care in an environment that protects patient privacy and modesty. However, many nurses now feel that family presence improves patient outcomes. You and other nurses on your unit have noted that vital signs are improved and patients are more responsive when family is present. You are considering whether to use a quantitative or qualitative study to research this topic.

Step 2: Consider the following questions:

· What is the purpose of hypotheses and research questions?
· Why is it important to develop workable hypotheses and research questions in conducting research?
· What type of research—qualitative or quantitative—would be most conducive to the scenario in Step 1? Why?
· Which would be more appropriate given the scenario in Step 1: the development of a hypothesis or a research question or both? Why?
·
Step 3: Write a two-four page paper.

· Write a paper that describes the purpose of hypotheses and research questions. Articulate the importance of developing workable hypotheses and research questions in conducting research. Based on the provided scenario, describe whether a qualitative or quantitative research study would be most appropriate and why. Explain whether, and why, you would develop a hypothesis or a central research question for this scenario.

Construct your paper and cite any sources in APA format with link

Discuss the importance of relationships in negotiations.Describe at least 2 tactics for managing conflict in negotiations.

Description
Students will use the planning scenario and the Negotiation Strategy Planning Template to guide their research and analysis throughout this course. Each week, students will complete a portion of the Negotiation Strategy Plan using the template provided.
This week, you will continue the training sessions on developing the Negotiation Planning Strategy. Specifically, you will identify and discuss the key elements that would assist you during the negotiation process. In addition, you will discuss the motivations and interests of both parties and their influence on the negotiations.
Access the Negotiation Strategy Planning Template. Use this template to complete this portion of the assignment.
Write a discussion of 800–1,200 words on the following topics:

Pertinent information (400–600 words) (Probable negotiation tactics, nature of current relationships)

Relationships and interdependence

Discuss the importance of relationships in negotiations.
Describe at least 2 tactics for managing conflict in negotiations.

Interests, desires, and motivations (400–600 words)

Strategy and tactics

Compare and contrast distributive and integrative negotiations.
Based on your research, discuss at least 2 integrative negotiation skills or tactics.